<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rigging the Seanad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/</link>
	<description>Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24494</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24494</guid>
		<description>I would think that raffling a vote on eBay would not be substantially different to granting it to the most generous lobbyist or special interest group.

In a sense, selling it to the highest bidder is, unfortunately, the name of the game. At least eBay provides some measure of transparency to an otherwise shadowed process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that raffling a vote on eBay would not be substantially different to granting it to the most generous lobbyist or special interest group.</p>
<p>In a sense, selling it to the highest bidder is, unfortunately, the name of the game. At least eBay provides some measure of transparency to an otherwise shadowed process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24409</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24409</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the ball has already started rolling: http://www.irishelection.com/07/greens-to-propose-seanad-election-reform/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the ball has already started rolling: <a href="http://www.irishelection.com/07/greens-to-propose-seanad-election-reform/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.irishelection.com');">http://www.irishelection.com/07/greens-to-propose-seanad-election-reform/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24379</guid>
		<description>If you read some more you'll see that I want the Seanad altered so that everyone gets a vote not just 3rd level folks in our various guises. 

After all, I'm not able to vote myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read some more you&#8217;ll see that I want the Seanad altered so that everyone gets a vote not just 3rd level folks in our various guises. </p>
<p>After all, I&#8217;m not able to vote myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dahamsta</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24375</link>
		<dc:creator>dahamsta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesgalvin.com/2007/07/21/rigging-the-seanad/#comment-24375</guid>
		<description>+1 James, agree with you completely. How do we go about getting reform in the Seanad though? It's in the Dail's best interest to keep it that way, and how many of the sitting "senators" are going to vote for reform?

adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 James, agree with you completely. How do we go about getting reform in the Seanad though? It&#8217;s in the Dail&#8217;s best interest to keep it that way, and how many of the sitting &#8220;senators&#8221; are going to vote for reform?</p>
<p>adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
